There's a blog coming in a month to explain the reason for this tire test, but I'm not sharing details today (but IFYKYK, please keep it on the downlow for now).
I LOVE my Grand Prix 5000 tires on my Bianchi Infinito that I got last year from Tonka Cycle & Ski! I'll be sure to keep buying them as I need new road tires. But some times, I like to ride my Bianchi on roads that do not have pavement, and for that, I'm a big fan of GravelKing SK tires. So I swapped from the GP5000 to the GravelKing tires this week and did the same silly tire test I did with my Pugsley earlier this summer
The test was 28 mm Continental Grand Prix 5000 vs 32 mm Panaracer GravelKing SK - seriously an apples-to-oranges comparison... but that wasn't really the point, my point is what is the "price" to be paid to ride gravel tires on pavement. And I was surprised by the results.
First, I'm changing tire size, tubes, and tire pressure on this test, while keeping the bike, body position, and routes/segments for this test, while targeting 200W.
Weights to start, 'cause weight-weenies:
28 mm Grand Prix 5000 with butyl tubes - 1310 g |
32 mm Gravel King SK with latex tubes - 1420 g |
- Blake to Beltline https://www.strava.com/segments/7168647
- Beltline to Blake street https://www.strava.com/segments/7168656
Blake to Beltline |
Beltline to Blake street |
I'm blown away that one of these tests were so close to the same time with the same power! The other segment is more complex with the 8W difference in power, and 21 seconds difference, that a 4.7% difference in time over the the segment.... and that's a shockingly small margin for gravel tires versus road tires ... and 8W less power (or 3.8% less power).
No comments:
Post a Comment